structure | text | news | downloads
Login
Factlist & suchen

  Home > 5+1 Questions > Q2 Fusion or Outsourcing
  
Click to hide the left frame

jump to topic:

  topic structure author date infoid
Q2 Fusion or Outsourcing      28 Jän. 07; 10:43   279833.1
 
“Should we integrate navreme (or expertise) into 3s?” – Gain?


 
B1      29 Jän. 07; 12:25   279897.1
 
Fool: also die Expertise jedenfalls – aber Achtung langsam rein und langsam raus – bis der richtige Rhythmus da ist,…

Loyalität: ich fühl mich zerissen, zu wem bin ich loyal zu Navreme oder zu 3s? Wenn Navreme, dann keine Integration, nur die Dienstleistung anbieten und da den Job sauber machen. Damit genug Geld verdienen, dass sich ein Büro und so ausgeht.
Zu 3s – ich geb mich als Navreme auf, denn wenn sich schon jemand die Mühe nimmt sich so lang mit mir zu beschäftigen, dann muß ich unendlich Dankbar sein. Vorteil – Abhängigkeit und Sicherheit


 
G1      29 Jän. 07; 12:32   279903.1
 
I believe that navreme as a network will continue to exist anyway, even when there is no more legal body behind it. A network lives from the strengths of the nods in the net (not only the name and the size of the net), and personally I would not like to give up these valuable nods. The internet will function, and like minded people will continue to get along and do eventually things together.

For external or associated members, and maybe even for your offices, not too much will change. But, and this is the main point, the network lives from the centre and one person to take properly care of it …

I guess the major question you are not asking here is, if you will give up your freedom and your personal interest to work with personal friends across Europe. You might give it a try, Bernd, but be sure you have a parachute with you, and that should be your friends and the old knods in the network.


 

legend: - author; - date; - infoid;